Composition of a harmonic function with a holomorphic function

I noticed this question while reading several pdfs of lecture notes, and I’m having trouble figuring it out. Can anyone help?

If $f$ is a harmonic function in a domain $D \subset \mathbb{C}$, and $g$ is a conformal mapping of a domain $D_0$ onto $D$, is $f \circ g$ harmonic in $D_0$?

Thank you so much!

Solutions Collecting From Web of "Composition of a harmonic function with a holomorphic function"

The answer is yes, and we only need $g$ to be holomorphic. One can prove this by directly computing the Laplacian of $f\circ g$ using the Chain Rule. I’d rather use $z$ and $\bar z$ than $x$ and $y$ for this purpose.

$$\Delta(f\circ g)=\frac{1}{4}(f\circ g)_{z\bar z} = \frac{1}{4}[(f_z\circ g) g’]_{\bar z} = \frac{1}{4}(f_{z\bar z}\circ g) \overline{g’} g’= [(\Delta f)\circ g]|g’|^2=0$$

Let $\phi(x,y)$ be harmonic in $D$. Let $w=f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)$ be analytic in $D$ defining a mapping $D\to D_0$. Let $\Phi(u,v)=\phi(x,y)$
$$\phi_x=\Phi_u u_x+\Phi_v v_x$$
$$\phi_y=\Phi_u u_y+\Phi_v v_y$$
$$\phi_{xx}=\Phi_{uu}(u_x)^2+\Phi_{uv} u_x v_x +\Phi_u u_{xx} +\Phi_{vv} (v_x)^2+\Phi_{vu} v_x u_x +\Phi_v v_{xx}$$
$$\phi_{yy}=\Phi_{uu}(u_y)^2+\Phi_{uv} u_y v_y +\Phi_u u_{yy} +\Phi_{vv} (v_y)^2+\Phi_{vu} v_y u_y +\Phi_v v_{yy}$$
$u_{xx}+v_{yy}=0$, $v_{xx}+v_{yy}=0$, $u_xv_x=-u_yv_y$
$$\Delta \Phi = \frac{1}{|f'(z)|^2}\Delta \phi$$
So if $f'(z)\ne 0$ in $D$, then $\Phi$ is harmonic n $D$

Your question can be interpreted in the greater context of “maps preserving harmonic functions”.

Definition Let $(M,g)$ and $(N,h)$ be Riemannian manifolds. A mapping $\Phi:M\to N$ is said to be a harmonic morphism if whenever $u:N\to\mathbb{R}$ is a harmonic function (solving $\triangle_h u = 0$ where $\triangle_h$ is the Laplace-Beltrami operator for the Riemannian metric $h$) the composition $u\circ \Phi$ is a harmonic function on $M$.

Theorem A mapping is a harmonic morphism if and only if it is a harmonic map which is weakly horizontally conformal.

(Don’t worry too much about the undefined terms in the above theorem.)

Corollary If $M$ and $N$ have the same number of dimensions, then

  • If dimension is 2, $\Phi$ is a harmonic morphism if and only if $\Phi$ is conformal.
  • If the dimension is bigger than 2, $\Phi$ is a harmonic morphism if and only if $\Phi$ is a conformal map with a constant coefficient of conformality.

For reference, see this paper of Bent Fuglede’s.

The term “harmonic” will mean “real and harmonic” below. I will use the following:

1) Compositions of holomorphic functions are holomorphic.

2) The real and imaginary parts of a holomorphic function are harmonic.

3) If $D\subset \mathbb C$ is an open disc, and $u$ is harmonic in $D,$ then there exists $v$ harmonic in $D$ such that $u+iv$ is holomorphic in $D.$

1) is just the chain rule. 2) follows from the Cauchy-Riemann equations. If you are unfamiliar with 3), I can add a proof later. I’ll assume it for now.

Thm: Suppose $\Omega_1, \Omega_2 \subset \mathbb C$ are open. Assume $u$ is harmonic on $\Omega_2$ and $f: \Omega_1 \to \Omega_2$ is holomorphic. Then $u\circ f$ is harmonic on $\Omega_1.$

Proof: Let $a \in \Omega_1.$ Because harmonicity is a local property, it suffices to show $u\circ f$ is harmonic in a neighborhood of $a.$

Choose an open disc $D$ centered at $f(a)$ contained in $\Omega_2.$ Then by 3) above, there exists a $v$ harmonic in $D$ such that $u+iv$ is holomorphic in $D.$ Let $\omega = f^{-1}(D).$ Then $\omega $ is an open neighborhood of $a$ contained in $\Omega_1,$ and $f:\omega \to D.$ By 1), $(u+iv)\circ f$ is holomorphic in $\omega.$ By 2), the real part of $(u+iv)\circ f$ is harmonic in $\omega.$ But this real part is precisely $u\circ f,$ and we’re done.