Intereting Posts

If $X$ is an orthogonal matrix, why does $X^TX = I$?
Question about the proof of the Brownian motion being a Strong Markov process from Schilling.
Non-T1 Space: Is the set of limit points closed?
Linearly independent set can be completed to a basis
How prove binomial cofficients $\sum_{k=0}^{}(-1)^k\binom{n+1}{k}\binom{2n-3k}{n}=\sum_{k=}^n\binom{n+1}{k}\binom{k}{n-k}$
Find all solutions to $x^9 \equiv 25$(mod 29)
How to prove that $f$ is convex function if $f(\frac{x+y}2)\leq \frac12f(x) + \frac12f(y)$ and $f$ is continuous?
Relation of Brownian Motion to Helmholtz Equation
Does the assertion that every two cardinalities are comparable imply the axiom of choice?
Integrable – martingale
How to write two for loops in math notation?
$\prod_{k=0}^{\infty} \cos(x \cdot 2^{-k}).$
Discontinuous linear functional
Interpretation of a probability problem: expected value.
Find all ideals of $\mathbb R / \langle x^2-3x+2\rangle$

I have come across a question about determining possible minimal polynomials for a rank one linear operator and I am wondering if I am using the correct proof method. I think that the facts needed to solve this problem come from the section on Nilpotent operators from Hoffman and Kunze’s “Linear Algebra”.

Question: Let $V$ be a vector space of dimension $n$ over the field $F$ and consider a linear operator $T$ on $V$ such that $\mathrm{rank}(T) = 1$. List all possible minimal polynomials for $T$.

Sketch of Proof: If $T$ is nilpotent then the minimal polynomial of $T$ is $x^k$ for some $k\leq n$. So suppose $T$ is not nilpotent, then we can argue that $T$ is diagonalizable based on the fact that $T$ must have one nonzero eigenvalue otherwise it would be nilpotent (I am leaving details of the proof of diagonalization but it is the observation that the characteristic space of the nonzero eigenvalue is the range of T and has dimension $1$). Thus the minimal polynomial of $T$ is just a linear term $x-c$.

- What exactly is an integral kernel?
- How to show that restricted Lorentz group (orthochoronous proper Lorentz transformations) is a normal subgroup?
- Exponential of matrices and bounded operators
- Order of general- and special linear groups over finite fields.
- Is there anything special about this matrix?
- Orthonormal basis with specific norm

Did I make a mistake assuming that $T$ can have only one nonzero eigenvalue?

Thanks for your help

- A linear operator commuting with all such operators is a scalar multiple of the identity.
- How to prove that the spectral radius of a linear operator is the infimum over all subordinate norms of the corresponding norm of the operator.
- Overlapping positive definite block matrices
- Diagonalization and eigenvalues
- Strictly diagonally dominant matrices are non singular
- An algebra of nilpotent linear transformations is triangularizable
- The relation between axes of 3D rotations
- Can any linear transformation be represented by a matrix?
- Given a matrix $A$ of rank $n$, show that $\det(\operatorname{adj}(A))=\det(A)^{n-1}$ and $\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}(A))=(\det A)^{n-2}A$
- Decompose rotation matrix to plane of rotation and angle

If $n=1$ then $T$ is multiplication by some $a\in F$, the minimal polynomial$\mu_T$ of $T$ is $X-a$, and $\def\rk{\operatorname{rk}}\rk T=1$ means that $a\neq0$. Now assume $n>1$; then $T$ cannot be any scalar multiplication, so one certainly has $\deg(\mu_T)>1$.

Since $T$ has rank$~1$, it can be factored through (the $1$-dimensional vector space) $F$, that is $T=f\circ\alpha$ where $\alpha\in\mathcal L(V,F)=V^*$ and $f\in\mathcal L(F,V)$ is just scalar multiplication of a fixed vector $v\in V$. One has $T^2=f\circ\alpha\circ f\circ\alpha$, and since $\alpha\circ f\in\mathcal L(F,F)$ is scalar multiplication by $\def\tr{\operatorname{tr}}c=\alpha(v)=\tr T$, one gets $T^2=c(f\circ\alpha)=cT$, so that $\mu_T=X^2-cX=X(X-c)$. Here $c\in F$ can be anything; if $c=0$ then $T$ is nilpotent of order$~2$, hence not diagonalisable, otherwise $T$ is diagonalisable with distinct eigenvalues $0$ and $c$.

An alternative argument without using an explicit decomposition of $T$ goes as follows. By rank-nullity $T$ has an eigenvalue$~0$, so $\mu_T$ contains a factor$~X$. The remaining factor $\mu’=\mu_T/X$ of$~\mu_T$ is equal to the minimal polynomial of the restriction of$~T$ to its image. That image has dimension $\rk T=1$ on which $T$ therefore acts by some scalar$~c$, so $\mu’=X-c$, and $\mu_T=X(X-c)$. There are many ways to see that $c$ is the trace of$~T$, one of which it that the trace of any operator equals that of its restriction to its image.

- Why does $A^TA=I, \det A=1$ mean $A$ is a rotation matrix?
- uniqueness heat equation
- Computing $ \int_a^b \frac{x^p}{\sqrt{(x-a)(b-x)}} \mathrm dx$
- projective cubic
- Prove that $ \frac{n}{\phi(n)} = \sum\limits_{d \mid n} \frac{\mu^2(d)}{\phi(d)} $
- Regular expression 00 or 11 not both
- What is the fastest way to find the characteristic polynomial of a matrix?
- How does Riemannian geometry yield the postulates of Euclidean Geometry?
- There is a unique polynomial interpolating $f$ and its derivatives
- Categorification of the (co-)induced topology
- Properly Defining a Smooth Curve
- The differential equation $xu_{x}+yu_{y}=2u$ satisfying the initial condition $y=xg(x),u=f(x)$
- How to solve integral in Mathematica?
- Calculate half life of esters
- Elementary proof of the irreducibility of $T^4 – a T – 1$ in $\mathbf{Q}$ when $a\in\mathbf{Z}-\{0\}$