Intereting Posts

Why does the amoeba shrink to its skeleton when we go to infinity?
How to define $A\uparrow B$ with a universal property as well as $A\oplus B$, $A\times B$, $A^B$ in category theory?
Modular Forms: Find a set of representatives for the cusps of $\Gamma_0(4)$
Show that if $A^{n}=I$ then $A$ is diagonalizable.
Perturbative solution to $x^3+x-1=0$
Every finitely generated algebra over a field is a Jacobson ring
Is the Structure Group of a Fibre Bundle Well-Defined?
Finding value of an expression
$||u||\leq ||u+av|| \Longrightarrow \langle u,v\rangle=0$
Probability of a repeatedly right answer
Empty set does not belong to empty set
Does one of $L^\infty$ and $L^p, p \in (0, \infty)$ contain the other?
Subgroups of finite index in divisible group
Is projection of a measurable subset in product $\sigma$-algebra onto a component space measurable?
Why is $e$ so special?

A function $f : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is said to be analytic in an open set $A \subset \mathbb{C}$ if it is differentiable at each point of the set $A$.

The function $f : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is said to be holomorphic if it has power series representation.

We can prove that the two concepts are same for a single variable complex functions. So why these two different terms? Is there any difference between these two concepts in general, please give example.

- Multivariate Residue Theorem?
- Show that $f$ is a polynomial of degree $\le n$
- If $u$ is harmonic and bounded in $0 < |z| < \rho$, show that the origin is a removable singularity
- Mapping half-plane to unit disk?
- complex polynomial satisfying inequality
- On the growth of the Jacobi theta function

Thank you for your help.

- Evaluate $\int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin^2 \theta}{(1-2a\cos\theta+a^2)(1-2b\cos\theta+b^2)}\mathrm{d\theta}, \space 0<a<b<1$
- Question about fixpoints and zero's on the complex plane.
- Congruent Modulo $n$: definition
- the product of diagonals of a regular polygon
- Apollonius circle, its radius and center
- Is this function holomorphic at 0?
- Solving an integral coming from Perron's formula
- Improper integration involving complex analytic arguments
- Intuition or figure for Reverse Triangle Inequality $||\mathbf{a}| − |\mathbf{b}|| ≤ |\mathbf{a} − \mathbf{b}|$ (Abbott p 11 q1.2.5)
- complex analysis(complex numbers) - Apollonius circle (derivation of proof)

So why these two different terms?

Because the history of mathematical terms is long and complicated. At least we stopped talking about monogenic functions and regular functions, which are two more terms for the same concept (as far as complex analysis is concerned). Quoting HOMT site:

In modern analysis the term ANALYTIC FUNCTION is used in two ways: (of a complex function) having a complex derivative at every point of its domain, and in consequence possessing derivatives of all orders and agreeing with its Taylor series locally; (of a real function) possessing derivatives of all orders and agreeing with its Taylor series locally.

Since the first usage is so popular (due to the ubiquity of power series in complex analysis, where they exist for every differentiable function), one will often say *real-analytic* when referring to the usage of the second kind.

Also from HOMT, an explanation of what *analytic* meant in the less rigorous age of analysis:

[In Lagrange’s] Théorie des Fonctions Analytiques (1797) […] an analytic function simply signified a function of the kind treated in analysis. The connection between the usage of Lagrange and modern usage is explained by Judith V. Grabiner in her The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus: “For Lagrange, all the applications of calculus … rested on those properties of functions which could be learned by studying their Taylor series developments … Weierstrass later exploited this idea in his theory of functions of a complex variable, retaining Lagrange’s term “analytic function” to designate, for Weierstrass, a function of a complex variable with a convergent Taylor series.”

As for “holomorphic”: in complex analysis we often encounter both Taylor series and Laurent series. For the latter, it matters very much whether the number of negative powers is finite or infinite. To enunciate these distinctions, the words *holomorphic* and *meromorphic* were introduced. *Meromorphic* allows poles (i.e., finitely many negative powers in the Laurent series), while holomorphic does not. From a certain viewpoint (the Riemann sphere), meromorphic functions are no worse than holomorphic ones; while at other times, the presence of poles changes the situation.

- Finding the unique rock with its weight
- probability of rolling at least $n$ on $k$ 6-sided dice
- Integration of a trigonometric function
- Is there a non-affine harmonic map with constant determinant?
- Real Dirichlet characters mod $k$
- Where can I find the original papers by Frobenius concerning solutions to $x^n = 1$ in a finite group?
- Consecutive coupon collection
- An application of Riesz' Lemma
- Non-Noetherian ring with a single prime ideal
- How come the Bernstein operator creates a polynomial of the same degree as its input function?
- Indefinite inner product spaces?
- Gradient descent with constraints
- derivative with respect to constant.
- Prove with induction that $11$ divides $10^{2n}-1$ for all natural numbers.
- Books to study for Math GRE, self-study, have some time.