# Frobenius Inequality Rank

I was looking for an answer for this problem in terms of matrices, but I really don’t know how to prove this result. The proposition says that:

Let $A\in M_{m\times k}(\mathbb{C})$, $B\in M_{k\times p}(\mathbb{C})$ and $C\in M_{p\times n}(\mathbb{C})$, then $\textrm{rank}(AB)+\textrm{rank}(BC)\leq \textrm{rank}(B)+\textrm{rank}(ABC)$

#### Solutions Collecting From Web of "Frobenius Inequality Rank"

Notation:

• $\rho(\cdot)$ stands for rank,
• $\ker(\cdot)$ for null space (aka kernel),
• $\text{im}(\cdot)$ for column space (aka image).

All we need is the following well known identity (see this answer for a proof):
$$\rho(AB)=\rho(B)−\dim(\text{im}(B) \cap \ker(A)) \tag{1}$$
and the following observation: $$\text{im}(BC) \cap \ker(A) \subseteq \text{im}(B)\cap \ker(A)\tag{2}$$ which holds since $\text{im}(BC)\subseteq \text{im}(B)$.

Now we want to write $\rho(ABC)$ in such a way that $\text{im}(BC)\cap \ker(A)$ pops up, so we could make use of $(2)$. Analogously to $(1)$:

$$\rho(ABC)=\rho(BC)−\dim(\text{im}(BC) \cap \ker(A)) \tag{3}.$$

From $(1)$ and $(3)$:

$$\rho(AB)+ \rho(BC) = \rho(B) + \rho(ABC) + \underbrace{\dim(\text{im}(BC) \cap \ker(A))−\dim(\text{im}(B) \cap \ker(A))}_{\leq 0 \text{ due to } (2)}$$ which implies the desired inequality.