Holomorphic function of a matrix

A statement is made below. The questions are:

(a) Is the statement true?

(b) If it is, does it appear in the literature?

Here is the statement.

For any matrix $A$ in $M_n(\mathbb C)$, write $\Lambda(A)$ for the set of eigenvalues of $A$.

Recall that there is a unique continuous $\mathbb C[X]$-algebra morphism
$$
\mathcal O(\Lambda(A))\to M_n(\mathbb C),
$$
where $\mathcal O(\Lambda(A))$ is the algebra of those functions which are holomorphic on (some open neighborhood of) $\Lambda(A)$. Recall also that this morphism is usually denoted by $f\mapsto f(A)$. (Here $X$ is an indeterminate.)

Let $U$ be an open subset of $\mathbb C$, let $U’$ be the open subset of $M_n(\mathbb C)$ defined by the condition
$$
\Lambda(A)\subset U,
$$
and let $f$ be holomorphic on $U$. (The fact the $U’$ is open follows from Rouché’s Theorem.)

STATEMENT. The map $A\mapsto f(A)$ from $U’$ to $M_n(\mathbb C)$ is holomorphic.

Solutions Collecting From Web of "Holomorphic function of a matrix"

The following was explained to me by Jean-Pierre Ferrier, and Ahmed Jeddi made useful comments.

For any matrix $a$ in $A:=M_n(\mathbb C)$, write $\Lambda(a)$ for the set of eigenvalues of $a$. For each $\lambda$ in $\Lambda(a)$, write $1_\lambda\in\mathbb C[a]$ for the projector onto the $\lambda$-generalized eigenspace parallel to the other generalized eigenspaces, and put $a_\lambda:=a1_\lambda$, and $z_\lambda:=z1_\lambda$ for $z$ in $\mathbb C$.

Let $U$ be an open subset of $\mathbb C$, let $U’$ be the subset of $A$, which is open by Rouché’s Theorem, defined by the condition $\Lambda(a)\subset U$, let $a$ be in $U’$, let $X$ be an indeterminate, let $\mathcal O(U)$ be the $\mathbb C$-algebra of holomorphic functions on $U$, and equip $\mathcal O(U)$ and $\mathbb C[a]$ with the $\mathbb C[X]$-algebra structures associated respectively with the element $z\mapsto z$ of $\mathcal O(U)$ and the element $a$ of $\mathbb C[a]$.

Theorem 1. (i) There is a unique $\mathbb C[X]$-algebra morphism from $\mathcal O(U)$ to $\mathbb C[a]$. We denote this morphism by $f\mapsto f(a)$.

(ii) The map $U’\ni a\mapsto f(a)\in A$ is holomorphic.

(iii) For any $a$ in $U’$ we have
$$
f(a)=\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(a),0\le k<n}\frac{f^{(k)}(\lambda)_\lambda}{k!}\ (a-\lambda)^k.
$$

Proof of (i) and (iii). By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, $\mathbb C[a]$ is isomorphic to the product of $\mathbb C[X]$-algebras of the form $\mathbb C[X]/(X-\lambda)^m$, with $\lambda\in\mathbb C$. So we can assume that $\mathbb C[a]$ is of this form, and the lemma follows from the fact that, for any $f$ in $\mathcal O(U)$, there is unique $g$ in $\mathcal O(U)$ such that
$$
f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}\ \frac{f^{(k)}(\lambda)}{k!}\ (z-\lambda)^k+(z-\lambda)^mg(z)
$$
for all $z$ in $U$. q.e.d.

Say that a cycle is a formal finite sum of smooth closed curves. Let $\gamma$ be a cycle in $U\setminus\Lambda(a)$ such that $I(\gamma,\lambda)=1$ for all $\lambda\in\Lambda(a)$ (where $I(\gamma,\lambda)$ is the winding number of $\gamma$ around $\lambda$), and let $N$ be the set of those $b$ in $A$ such that $\Lambda(b)\subset U$, and that $\gamma$ is a cycle in $U\setminus\Lambda(b)$ satisfying $I(\gamma,\lambda)=1$ for all $\lambda\in\Lambda(b)$. As already observed, Rouché’s Theorem implies that $N$ is an open neighborhood of $a$ in $A$. Theorem 2 below will imply Part (ii) of Theorem 1.

Theorem 2. We have
$$
f(b)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ \frac{f(z)}{z-b}\ dz
$$
for all $f$ in $\mathcal O(U)$ and all $b$ in $N$. In particular the map $b\mapsto f(b)$ from $U’$ to $A$ is holomorphic.

Proof. We have
$$
\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ \frac{f(z)}{z-b}\ dz
$$
$$
=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ \frac{f(z)}{z-b}\ \sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b)}1_\lambda\ dz
$$
$$
=\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b)}\frac{1_\lambda}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ \frac{f(z)}{z-b}\ dz
$$
$$
=\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b)}\frac{1_\lambda}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ \frac{f(z)\ dz}{(z-\lambda)-(b-\lambda)}
$$
$$
=\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b)}\frac{1_\lambda}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ f(z)\ \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\
\frac{(b-\lambda)^k}{(z-\lambda)^{k+1}}\ dz
$$
$$
=\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b),0\le k<n}\frac{1_\lambda}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma\ \frac{f(z)\ dz}{(z-\lambda)^{k+1}}\ (b-\lambda)^k
$$
$$
\overset{(*)}{=}\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b),0\le k<n}I(\gamma,\lambda)\ \frac{f^{(k)}(\lambda)_\lambda}{k!}\ (b-\lambda)^k
$$
$$
=\sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda(b),0\le k<n}\frac{f^{(k)}(\lambda)_\lambda}{k!}\ (b-\lambda)^k
$$
$$
\overset{(**)}{=}f(b),
$$
where Equality $(*)$ follows from the Residue Theorem, and Equality $(**)$ from Part (iii) of Theorem 1. q.e.d.