Assuming that a person has taken standard undergraduate math courses (algebra, analysis, point-set topology), what other things he must know before he can understand the Langlands program and its geometric analogue?
What are the good books for learning these topics?
Is there any book which can explain the Langlands program to an undergraduate with very few prerequisites?
I am going to contradict the answers given and say: do not read any introductions to the Langlands program at this stage. Instead, learn the following things first (and take your time over them!) and do lots of exercises:
When you have that covered (two or three years down the line), then you will benefit from reading about the Langlands program. In the meantime, once you have learned representation theory and Galois theory (can be done in one or two months if you are very bright), you should approach a faculty member at your university. He or she will be able to give you a very rough overview of the general Langlands philosophy, so that you very roughly know where you are heading.
All this is not supposed to discourage you, but rather to excite you about all the fascinating things that lie ahead of you, and to warn you not to skip any of the essentials if you really want to appreciate the beauty of the whole edifice.
I don’t think the Langlands program is accessible to the average undergraduate student. In particular, you won’t understand a thing if you have no prior knowledge of algebraic number theory (and class field theory). But, once you passed through the requirements spelled out in Alex B’s answer (and in this paper), then here’s a list of interesting references:
But again, remember this: One does not simply learn what the Langlands program is about.
To get started on this check out this paper:
That’s a good survey article on the Langland’s program. It’s takes you through the historical perspective to Artin reciprocity and it’s implications. If you look that over you’ll get a good overview of what you need to know; class-field theory, L-functions, p-adic numbers, adeles, automorphic forms, and group representations. To get a good handle on this stuff check out Frohlich and Taylor:
I have a copy of this book and in my opinion it is accessible to someone with a good course in Number Theory and perhaps two courses in Algebra at the grad level. I don’t think an undergrad is going to get there on his own but with guidance from an advisor working in number theory you can do it.
Now I’m no expert in Langlands but (I believe) the Langland’s program is a series of conjectures that are basically consequences and generalizations of Artin reciprocity.
Give it a shot. The Langlands program is some deep stuff that took on a role of the same magnitude as Klein’s Erlanger program before it. You really can’t go wrong getting to the bottom of this one.
Peter Scholze, a young man recently made a Clay Mathematics Institute research fellow, wrote some readable papers on the Langlands correspondence.
If you read them, please share your experience (if it was the right level / style for you).
A quite late answer, but in case anyone else finds this in a search: the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley has put up a series of videotaped lectures by Dr. Edward Frenkel at UC Berkeley (5.5 hours long) from a workshop he gave in fall 2015 that was recorded for television broadcast in Japan. This introduction was meant to be accessible at the undergraduate level, so some may find it useful.
Read Frenkel’s Langlands Coorespondence for Loop Groups, https://math.berkeley.edu/~frenkel/loop.pdf
Standard college algebra is the only prerequisite.